This is just a little test to try posting images to Facebook via WordPress using my phone.
You know that old TCP/IP over carrier pigeons thing? Well, we should do that using people and cell phones.
Its pretty mind blowing that the National Review is trying to assert a causal effect between getting an abortion and doing drugs but that is what they do in their latest article about Texas gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis.
They even go on to assert that abortion will make you beat any children you have later and become mentally ill. I don’t suppose it occurs to them that the life situations that lead you to an abortion might also include drug use or mental illness. The article is pretty vague about whether there is a correlation between abortion and the onset of these conditions. I personally wouldn’t be surprised to find that mentally ill, child abusing drug addicts are statistically more likely to get an abortion but, then again, I might be profiling people.
Frankly, I cannot believe that they have lowered themselves to these kinds of tactics. They aren’t just slinging mud and Wendy Davis but at women in general and the intelligence of their readers.
My friend Russell Fish and I are heading down to Austin for the APS Sunset Review. The Sunset Review is a process where the state legislature reviews services and programs provided by the government and determines if they are obsolete, duplicated or unnecessary. We are going to present the troubling cases we have found where APS has seized personal assets and moved people into institutions against their will. We don’t see this particular service as something that benefits the people of the state of Texas. Hopefully we can bring these activities under closer review and even eliminate them for the many elderly people who can manage their own affairs.
Ean Schuessler I guess it’s a little predictable that the “reimagination” is mostly “have the city buy more art”. Does that change things or turn art into even more of a game where artists chase after these political “gate keepers”? Artists need to take the manifestation of their dreams into their own hands.
Ean Schuessler Ok, I’m kidding… sort of. I absolutely agree with you about “localizing” the artistic culture but I do want to reiterate the “bozo effect” that Steve Jobs talked about. As soon as the state starts throwing money around you will see a sudden manifestation of people presenting themselves as artists who are also masterful at manipulating the social spheres around the political infrastructure. These people will probably crowd out the actual “artists” who have long been slaving away in poverty and obscurity to create their dreams. Frankly, I’m a big fan of “commercial art” where the artist selects a market and crafts a product that is aligned with what they are wanting to produce. Some see this as selling out but I see it as an engineering problem. If, as an artist, you want to produce product X then its simply a matter of figuring out how to reach audience Y that wants it. There is a question of pandering to audiences but you don’t have to do that. Its up to the artist who they pander to, that’s part of the self-expression process. The state only has to get involved for artists whose work can’t be supported by its target audience. In my opinion this should be reserved for “cultural preservation” kinds of artists who practice forms with a strong history that are less in fashion and are more about preserving traditions of craft.
Heed me, oh working class. Corporate America will replace any job they can with a robot. It is so.